<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s SDL &#8211; a second look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=175</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spire Security Viewpoint</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=175&#038;cpage=1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Spire Security Viewpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=175#comment-237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Revisiting Microsoft&#039;s SDL&lt;/strong&gt;

In a previous post about Microsoft&#039;s Security Development Lifecycle, I promised to go into more details about what Microsoft could do to provide more evidence that its SDL is working. In followup, I tried to answer that question on our...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Revisiting Microsoft&#8217;s SDL</strong></p>
<p>In a previous post about Microsoft&#8217;s Security Development Lifecycle, I promised to go into more details about what Microsoft could do to provide more evidence that its SDL is working. In followup, I tried to answer that question on our&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
