<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Dose of Schneier Magic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=195</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=195&#038;cpage=1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=195#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Beau - That certainly is a better explanation for why he might have said what he said, but I still don&#039;t think it holds much water.

It doesn&#039;t help the 7 billion other people on the planet to have US Govt systems patched. Plus, it sounds to me like a bit of mental accounting to take into account the impact on one set of systems (US Govt) and not all systems where there might be sensitive data of yours.

It&#039;s a good point, though, and I&#039;ll think about it some more. Thanks for the feedback.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beau &#8211; That certainly is a better explanation for why he might have said what he said, but I still don&#8217;t think it holds much water.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t help the 7 billion other people on the planet to have US Govt systems patched. Plus, it sounds to me like a bit of mental accounting to take into account the impact on one set of systems (US Govt) and not all systems where there might be sensitive data of yours.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good point, though, and I&#8217;ll think about it some more. Thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=195&#038;cpage=1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=195#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Specifically, he&#039;s talking about the DHS paying to have open source code reviewed. And if this is code that the US Government is using, it&#039;s hard to see how it can NOT help everyone. Don&#039;t think of this as &quot;every site is automatically patched,&quot; think of it more as &quot;getting rid of bugs in US Government systems improves the security for all data stored by those systems.&quot; By this way of thinking, I think he&#039;s dead on.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specifically, he&#8217;s talking about the DHS paying to have open source code reviewed. And if this is code that the US Government is using, it&#8217;s hard to see how it can NOT help everyone. Don&#8217;t think of this as &#8220;every site is automatically patched,&#8221; think of it more as &#8220;getting rid of bugs in US Government systems improves the security for all data stored by those systems.&#8221; By this way of thinking, I think he&#8217;s dead on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
