<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting over the hump with vulnerability counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=197</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=197&#038;cpage=1#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=197#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this measure is utterly irrelevent. The number of vulnerabilities only matters to the companies who make the products in the sample.

To me, as a security/systems guy, I really couldn&#039;t care less if this number goes up, down, stays the same, or disappears.

If Windows has 0 vulns in a year, will that cause my actions to change? I might have an extra beer and give a hurrah for Microsoft, but that means nothing about my risk tomorrow, or the day after that, of a single new vuln to arise.

What if Windows has 0 vulns for 5 years? That doesn&#039;t eliminate mistakes or other such situations that my users, staff, or even myself might introduce into my environment. Again, little of my action will change.

If anything, my C-levels may eventually read such reports and lower my budget in response, which would (stupidly) change my behavior. But hey, that&#039;s life.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this measure is utterly irrelevent. The number of vulnerabilities only matters to the companies who make the products in the sample.</p>
<p>To me, as a security/systems guy, I really couldn&#8217;t care less if this number goes up, down, stays the same, or disappears.</p>
<p>If Windows has 0 vulns in a year, will that cause my actions to change? I might have an extra beer and give a hurrah for Microsoft, but that means nothing about my risk tomorrow, or the day after that, of a single new vuln to arise.</p>
<p>What if Windows has 0 vulns for 5 years? That doesn&#8217;t eliminate mistakes or other such situations that my users, staff, or even myself might introduce into my environment. Again, little of my action will change.</p>
<p>If anything, my C-levels may eventually read such reports and lower my budget in response, which would (stupidly) change my behavior. But hey, that&#8217;s life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
