<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Value and Loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=315</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perilocity</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=315&#038;cpage=1#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Perilocity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=315#comment-439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Ignore What&#039;s Hard to Measure?&lt;/strong&gt;

But IT security generally doesn&#039;t have the economic part worked out.
With quantification of value and probable loss we&#039;d have better risk management.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ignore What&#8217;s Hard to Measure?</strong></p>
<p>But IT security generally doesn&#8217;t have the economic part worked out.<br />
With quantification of value and probable loss we&#8217;d have better risk management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetHeidi</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=315&#038;cpage=1#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>PlanetHeidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=315#comment-438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been following the draft work for ISO 27004? It&#039;s all about setting an international standard for infosec measurements.  Essentially, layering on top of 27001 system for managing controls (controls being in 17799).  Lotsa tough math in there... but I see that as a good thing.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been following the draft work for ISO 27004? It&#8217;s all about setting an international standard for infosec measurements.  Essentially, layering on top of 27001 system for managing controls (controls being in 17799).  Lotsa tough math in there&#8230; but I see that as a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=315&#038;cpage=1#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=315#comment-437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your criticism is FAIR enough (sorry, couldn&#039;t resist).  I actually have not offered an alternative.

I believe the alternative lies in processes, not assets.

But measuring the value of a process, unless you&#039;ve got some hot shot consulting company (*cough*) is problematic.

Hopefully someone will figure it all out and distribute the answer using some open or semi-open license.


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your criticism is FAIR enough (sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist).  I actually have not offered an alternative.</p>
<p>I believe the alternative lies in processes, not assets.</p>
<p>But measuring the value of a process, unless you&#8217;ve got some hot shot consulting company (*cough*) is problematic.</p>
<p>Hopefully someone will figure it all out and distribute the answer using some open or semi-open license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
