<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Geographic Location Matter in Cybersecurity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=34" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=34</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tate Hansen</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Tate Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=34#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial companies are having some success selling it:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quova.com/page.php?id=10&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.quova.com/page.php?id=10&lt;/a&gt;

A title for one of www.the451group.com’s reports is “Digital Resolve&#039;s fraud detection blends IP geo-location and behavior analysis”.   I don’t have access to it, but the title purports to the utility.

Geographic information can be useful to answer questions like:
- should anyone be successfully VPNing into our corporate network from IP addresses outside of the US

Maybe the distinction here is between possessing geo-tagged IP data versus using actual maps?

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commercial companies are having some success selling it:<br />
<a href="http://www.quova.com/page.php?id=10" rel="nofollow">http://www.quova.com/page.php?id=10</a></p>
<p>A title for one of <a href="http://www.the451group.com’s" rel="nofollow">http://www.the451group.com’s</a> reports is “Digital Resolve&#8217;s fraud detection blends IP geo-location and behavior analysis”.   I don’t have access to it, but the title purports to the utility.</p>
<p>Geographic information can be useful to answer questions like:<br />
- should anyone be successfully VPNing into our corporate network from IP addresses outside of the US</p>
<p>Maybe the distinction here is between possessing geo-tagged IP data versus using actual maps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
