<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Alternate Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=346</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=346#comment-492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pass the word:

Peter Berdovsky Legal Defense Fund
Law Office of Michael L. Rich
74 Newport Street
Arlington MA 02476
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pass the word:</p>
<p>Peter Berdovsky Legal Defense Fund<br />
Law Office of Michael L. Rich<br />
74 Newport Street<br />
Arlington MA 02476</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newsham</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>newsham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=346#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The devices, disguised to look like newspaper stands (garbage cans, parked cars, etc.) were placed throughout the cities..&quot;

Why is a circuit board with batteries and wires threatening to you?  Would it be less threatening if it were made by sony or apple and sold in a friendly retail store?
Why aren&#039;t cars and newspaper stands more threatening to you?  Do you realize how easy it is to hide a bomb in a parked car?

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The devices, disguised to look like newspaper stands (garbage cans, parked cars, etc.) were placed throughout the cities..&#8221;</p>
<p>Why is a circuit board with batteries and wires threatening to you?  Would it be less threatening if it were made by sony or apple and sold in a friendly retail store?<br />
Why aren&#8217;t cars and newspaper stands more threatening to you?  Do you realize how easy it is to hide a bomb in a parked car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=346#comment-490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If something sticks out like a sore thumb, chances are that it was meant to be seen.

Bombs are not meant to be seen.

Therefore, if something sticks out like a sore thumb, chances are it is not a bomb.


The decision to be made, given finite resources, is just how unlikely the potential bomb needs to be before it can be ignored.

However, in this specific case it was easy to tell upon inspection that these were NOT bombs.  So, even if we set agree that all possible bombs even remotely likely to be real should be inspected, the fact that this set of them took sooooo long to be consigned to the &quot;false alarm&quot; heap is itself worthy of criticism.

&quot;Well, it could been a briefcase nuke with a Lite Brite attached&quot; is not enough to rationalize the reaction in Boston.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If something sticks out like a sore thumb, chances are that it was meant to be seen.</p>
<p>Bombs are not meant to be seen.</p>
<p>Therefore, if something sticks out like a sore thumb, chances are it is not a bomb.</p>
<p>The decision to be made, given finite resources, is just how unlikely the potential bomb needs to be before it can be ignored.</p>
<p>However, in this specific case it was easy to tell upon inspection that these were NOT bombs.  So, even if we set agree that all possible bombs even remotely likely to be real should be inspected, the fact that this set of them took sooooo long to be consigned to the &#8220;false alarm&#8221; heap is itself worthy of criticism.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, it could been a briefcase nuke with a Lite Brite attached&#8221; is not enough to rationalize the reaction in Boston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=346#comment-489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, I&#039;ve been trying to explain this at work all day but not nearly as well as you have done here.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I&#8217;ve been trying to explain this at work all day but not nearly as well as you have done here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
