<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should I Feel Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=412</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Farnum</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=412&#038;cpage=1#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R. Farnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=412#comment-676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Kurt on your answer, but not based on his reasons.  I say, because of your original interpretation of the event, that you don&#039;t think it went up much.  And you would probably say that even if it was known the information was copied and distributed.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kurt on your answer, but not based on his reasons.  I say, because of your original interpretation of the event, that you don&#8217;t think it went up much.  And you would probably say that even if it was known the information was copied and distributed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt wismer</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=412&#038;cpage=1#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt wismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=412#comment-675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m only guessing at what your answer is but i would say that it does absolutely nothing to reduce the risk of identity theft... the genie is out of the bottle and you can&#039;t put it back in - there&#039;s no way to know for sure whether or not copies were made so just because the hardware was recovered doesn&#039;t mean the secrets stored on it can be made secret again...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m only guessing at what your answer is but i would say that it does absolutely nothing to reduce the risk of identity theft&#8230; the genie is out of the bottle and you can&#8217;t put it back in &#8211; there&#8217;s no way to know for sure whether or not copies were made so just because the hardware was recovered doesn&#8217;t mean the secrets stored on it can be made secret again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
