Note that I am interpreting your use of the term “impersonate” as “allow a mistaken conclusion based on factual system inputs to continue uncorrected”.

Here’s some more:

1) Abel very strongly resembles the millionaire playboy son of a filthy-rich financier. The *real* millionaire playboy son, since he is a high-roller, is always “comped” when he stays at a fancy hotel in Abel’s city.

Abel, by chance, enters that hotel, and is immediately waited on hand and foot. The hotel manager tells Abel, “Your money is no good here, Mr. Playboy”, addressing him by the wrong name.

Is Abel doing something wrong by allowing the hotel to persist in their misidentification?

2) Rather than performing a visual ID, the hotel has a list of high rollers, identified solely by name. One of them is “Chris Abel”. A non-high-roller Chris Abel goes to check in, and is immediately treated like a king. Must he correct the hotel’s error?

3) What if the hotel identifies the high-rollers by comparing a phone number asked at registration to the phone number high-rollers used when they first started coming to the hotel? Abel truthfully supplies his phone number, but is mistaken for a high-roller because a high-roller used to have his current phone number.

4) What if Abel strongly resembles a celebrity with whom everyone is familiar, and whom everyone respects highly for having performed an act of great heroism, saving dozens of innocent children from a certain, painful death. Would he be wrong to allow others to buy him drinks, not correcting their mistaken idea that he is the admired celebrity?

5) Abel is himself a high-roller. Baker is a high-roller as well, but by sheer coincidence has as his current phone number the one Abel registered as a high-roller with at an earlier point. The hotel, through a programming error, gives Abel exactly what he expects as a high-roller, but records the visit in their high-roller log book as a visit by Baker. This log is used for no purpose other than to measure the total number of “high-roller visits”. Is Abel under an obligation to point out the hotel’s record-keeping error?

That is, Charlie the computer gets Alice and Bob confused. Alice chuckles, instead of trying to argue with the computer, or consume, uncompensated, her Alice’s time to “fix” the “problem.”

* Provides a notice regarding the collection and use
* Whether it is sent to the Internet
* Whether it is sent to a thrid party
* Whether the it is controlled by the user or by a central party
* Whether it is in use
* Whether access is provided to the user
* Whether it is secured

The book examines how the system uses the data and how that use is controlled and so on.