<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Modest Proposal to Eliminate the SSN Façade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=437</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emergent Chaos</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Emergent Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=437#comment-719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The SSN Is Also A Poor Identifier&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s an idea floating around that a major problem with SSNs is their dual use as identifiers and authenticators. (For example, Jeremy Epstein, &quot;Misunderstanding the risks of SSNs,&quot; in RISKS-24.29) This is correct, but the phraseology leads to people...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The SSN Is Also A Poor Identifier</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s an idea floating around that a major problem with SSNs is their dual use as identifiers and authenticators. (For example, Jeremy Epstein, &#8220;Misunderstanding the risks of SSNs,&#8221; in RISKS-24.29) This is correct, but the phraseology leads to people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spire Security Viewpoint</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Spire Security Viewpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=437#comment-720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;More on SSN Secrecy Facade&lt;/strong&gt;

Kim Cameron appears shocked that local governments are putting private information on the Web. Lets just publicize them all and be done with it. They are perfectly useful identifiers and truly awful authenticators. Read more in my previous post on elim...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on SSN Secrecy Facade</strong></p>
<p>Kim Cameron appears shocked that local governments are putting private information on the Web. Lets just publicize them all and be done with it. They are perfectly useful identifiers and truly awful authenticators. Read more in my previous post on elim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 Raindrop</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>1 Raindrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=437#comment-721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;150,000 person shared &quot;secret&quot; considered broken&lt;/strong&gt;

I like Pete&#039;s Modest Proposal to publish SSNs, I mean everyone gets up in arms about not taping your password to your monitor, but do 150,000 people walk by your monitor?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>150,000 person shared &#8220;secret&#8221; considered broken</strong></p>
<p>I like Pete&#8217;s Modest Proposal to publish SSNs, I mean everyone gets up in arms about not taping your password to your monitor, but do 150,000 people walk by your monitor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
