<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WMF Not Listed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=484</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=484&#038;cpage=1#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=484#comment-763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Anonymous -

Yes, you would have looked dumb. It is clearly a good thing that the WMF class of exploits and the corresponding vulnerability aren&#039;t as significant or I might look dumb, too. *Whew*. Who knows, a different exploit/attack vector may even increase my concern.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous -</p>
<p>Yes, you would have looked dumb. It is clearly a good thing that the WMF class of exploits and the corresponding vulnerability aren&#8217;t as significant or I might look dumb, too. *Whew*. Who knows, a different exploit/attack vector may even increase my concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Irritant</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=484&#038;cpage=1#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Irritant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=484#comment-762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I made the pretty much same point about the pre-auth Microsoft SQL Server buffer overflow in 2003. After all, there were only a couple thousand vulnerable hosts.

Oh, wait, no I didn&#039;t. Wow, I would have looked dumb today if I had! *Whew*.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I made the pretty much same point about the pre-auth Microsoft SQL Server buffer overflow in 2003. After all, there were only a couple thousand vulnerable hosts.</p>
<p>Oh, wait, no I didn&#8217;t. Wow, I would have looked dumb today if I had! *Whew*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
