<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox: Security&#8217;s Black Eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=602</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=602&#038;cpage=1#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 18:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=602#comment-874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The argument around heterogeneous environments is interesting, but with multi-vector attacks and the added complexity and overhead, I don&#039;t see a huge benefit.

For someone aiming to protect the entire Internet, maybe there is interest, but you&#039;d have to get highly heterogeneous to even make it work. (The largest worm I am aware of maybe compromised a few hundred thousand machines - even limiting to a million machines per O.S. or application type would require 600 different heterogeneous solutions).
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument around heterogeneous environments is interesting, but with multi-vector attacks and the added complexity and overhead, I don&#8217;t see a huge benefit.</p>
<p>For someone aiming to protect the entire Internet, maybe there is interest, but you&#8217;d have to get highly heterogeneous to even make it work. (The largest worm I am aware of maybe compromised a few hundred thousand machines &#8211; even limiting to a million machines per O.S. or application type would require 600 different heterogeneous solutions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Berman</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=602&#038;cpage=1#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Berman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=602#comment-873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sure seems like there is a visceral dislike of Microsoft products that clouds discussions.

I found the argument about heterogenous environments far more convincing than the &#039;secure because not Microsoft&#039; assertion. Of course that argument never asserts that you will have a more secure syste, just one that is less likely to suffer from the same attack that targets a different system.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure seems like there is a visceral dislike of Microsoft products that clouds discussions.</p>
<p>I found the argument about heterogenous environments far more convincing than the &#8216;secure because not Microsoft&#8217; assertion. Of course that argument never asserts that you will have a more secure syste, just one that is less likely to suffer from the same attack that targets a different system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
