<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Ahead of the Conficker Aftermath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=64" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=64</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt wismer</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=64&#038;cpage=1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt wismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=64#comment-62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;After Y2k, with many, many, many changes made and resulting in limited damage, people ridiculed the entire effort as much ado about nothing. Will Conficker preparations have the same fate?&quot;

probably yes... looking at any overhyped malware event (the one that sticks out in my mind is michaelangelo) there is usually backlash as a result of nothing happening...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After Y2k, with many, many, many changes made and resulting in limited damage, people ridiculed the entire effort as much ado about nothing. Will Conficker preparations have the same fate?&#8221;</p>
<p>probably yes&#8230; looking at any overhyped malware event (the one that sticks out in my mind is michaelangelo) there is usually backlash as a result of nothing happening&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
