<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still more on ROI in Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiresecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=705</link>
	<description>Risk and Cybersecurity Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam shostack</title>
		<link>http://spiresecurity.com/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>adam shostack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiresecurity.com/blog/?p=705#comment-915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first point, we&#039;re in agreement on.  I think that a lot of security economics is made harder by the difficulty of quantification.  I think a lot of presentation of security economics are hurt by using a technique other than the corporate standard.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first point, we&#8217;re in agreement on.  I think that a lot of security economics is made harder by the difficulty of quantification.  I think a lot of presentation of security economics are hurt by using a technique other than the corporate standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
