Archive for the 'Random' Category

Attention InfoSec Pros: measuring risk is in your future

Posted on March 3 2011 by Pete Lindstrom

Mike Rothman of Securosis stirs things up a bit with his “Risk Metrics are Crap” post. This type of exercise forces participants to make public commitments. In itself, this is not a huge deal since many positions of those in our space are relatively well documented already, however, anyone familiar with Cialdini knows that commitment [...]

Nuh, uh; Yuh, huh

Posted on February 11 2011 by Pete Lindstrom

(is that title the proper English spelling of two kids disagreeing? who knows…) Andrew Gelman’s enlightening blog points to a great example how scientific research helps us get smarter. He excerpts: Three articles published [by Brett Pelham et al.] have shown that a disproportionate share of people choose spouses, places to live, and occupations with [...]

Vulnerability Creation vs. Discovery vs. Fix

Posted on October 25 2010 by Pete Lindstrom

Michael Janke at Last In, First Out is rightly concerned about the respective run rates of the vulnerability creation process and our ability to fix them individually. He asks the question “Are we creating new vulnerabilities faster than we are fixing old ones?” after providing a list of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities from various time periods. [...]

Verizon PCI Report: the PCI 80/20 Rule

Posted on October 4 2010 by Pete Lindstrom

Today, Verizon released its Verizon 2010 Payment Card Industry Compliance Report which I had the pleasure of working on. One of the most interesting things in my opinion is the PCI 80/20 Rule. The broad results of the report show that approximately 80% of companies fail to pass the initial PCI audit. In addition, we [...]

Announcing: The Month of No Bugs (MONB)!

Posted on September 1 2010 by Pete Lindstrom

It is with great excitement and anticipation that I announce the Month of No Bugs (MONB)! This month, I promise NOT to look for any new bugs out there, NOT to artificially elevate my bugs above all others, NOT to complain that vendors should give me the attention I deserve, NOT to pound my chest [...]

Disclosing the Elephant in the Room of the Disclosure Debate

Posted on July 23 2010 by Pete Lindstrom

There has been a lot of discussion lately about vulnerability disclosure, with Google and Microsoft respectively weighing in with their latest opinions on the topic. There is really nothing new here, as evidenced by the Google folks referencing a 9-year-old Bruce Schneier essay on the topic. I have written extensively on the topic and the [...]

There is no such thing as *Real* Value

Posted on May 26 2010 by Pete Lindstrom

Rich Mogull has started a fire on his Securosis blog addressing questions of value and loss. I would like to provide some feedback. Most importantly, I would like to address this point: “I consider that an implied or assumed value, which may bear no correlation to the real value” Rich’s reference to something called a [...]

Charlie Miller’s “Teach a Man to Fish” approach to disclosure: the happy medium?

Posted on April 29 2010 by Pete Lindstrom

Pre-eminent bugfinder Charlie Miller mentioned an interesting approach to disclosure after he compromised another Apple system – demonstrate the attack, describe how the vulnerability was found, and let the chips fall where they may. (Actually, I think his “teach a man to fish” approach might have been ancillary to the pwn2own contest…) At this stage [...]