Nuisance Police? Anti-Propagators?

I must confess that sometimes I get depressed when the entire security profession seems to focus on a single problem. In this case, I will define the single problem as "undesired propagation," e.g. worms, viruses, and spam. This concern is a function of the difference between ‘low impact, high volume’ vs. ‘high impact, low volume’ perceptions of risk.

Let’s just all go out and get janitor badges that say "Nuisance Police".

2 comments for “Nuisance Police? Anti-Propagators?

  1. January 14, 2005 at 10:56 am

    Well, some say folks focus on viruses and worms, becuase most of the surveys show that they cause the maximum $$$ damage…

  2. Pete
    January 24, 2005 at 2:21 pm

    Anton – yes, I suspect they have a history of most damage, but that damage is spread across many different pocketbooks (worldwide), so it can be a bit deceiving. Think of the ‘damage’ done by Code Red – ultimately a worldwide rash that only required a reboot to resolve (I am simplifying a bit). Not that the surveys really matter since we can’t/don’t normalize the responses.

Comments are closed.